Re: [PATCH v2 16/21] dt-bindings: spi: document support for SA8255p

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/09/2024 23:06, Nikunj Kela wrote:
> 
> On 9/4/2024 9:58 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Sorry, didn't realize SPI uses different subject format than other
>>> subsystems. Will fix in v3. Thanks
>> Each subsystem is free to use its own form. e.g for netdev you will
>> want the prefix [PATCH net-next v42] net: stmmac: dwmac-qcom-ethqos:
> of course they are! No one is disputing that.
>>
>> This is another reason why you should be splitting these patches per
>> subsystem, and submitting both the DT bindings and the code changes as
>> a two patch patchset. You can then learn how each subsystem names its
>> patches.
> 
> Qualcomm QUPs chips have serial engines that can be configured as
> UART/I2C/SPI so QUPs changes require to be pushed in one series for all
> 3 subsystems as they all are dependent.

No, they are not dependent. They have never been. Look how all other
upstreaming process worked in the past.


Best regards,
Krzysztof