On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 8:04 PM Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 04:33:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:06 PM Charles Keepax > > <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > Thinking more about this, maybe even the ACPI case also can be combined? > > See for the details > > > > 87526603c892 ("irqdomain: Get rid of special treatment for ACPI in > > __irq_domain_add()") > > 9ed78b05f998 ("irqdomain: Allow software nodes for IRQ domain creation") > > Maybe, I am not super confident that acpi_dev_name will always > return the same thing as fwnode_get_name and I don't really want > to risk renaming everything on the ACPI side. Scratch this. They are completely different. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko