On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:06 PM Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Use the more modern is_acpi_device_node() rather than checking > ACPI_COMPANION(). I don't think it's valuable on its own. There is no clear motivation why to do that, I suggested it exactly in the conjunction of not introducing two ways of fwnode type check. That said, you probably want to elaborate the motivation in the commit message if you want to keep it separate. ... > +#include <linux/fwnode.h> This header is not supposed to be included by the end users. property.h is. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko