Re: [PATCH] spi: sh-msiof: avoid integer overflow in constants

Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: sh-msiof: avoid integer overflow in constants
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:40:19 +0100
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAMuHMdVBXXpv9QfttBETQAeeRQjWRvfVJnrpPNiQj-N1SB9GQw@mail.gmail.com>
Mail-followup-to: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20240130094053.10672-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <CAMuHMdUMeHCCiAkNyJMHTGUSTqewt=AWPUy+beA_kR26vcS8_Q@mail.gmail.com> <Zbjc_p_Pin7TAHw4@ninjato> <CAMuHMdVBXXpv9QfttBETQAeeRQjWRvfVJnrpPNiQj-N1SB9GQw@mail.gmail.com>

> > But they don't match, so we can't unify them?
> 
> I stand corrected...

So, the patch is good as-is?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] spi: sh-msiof: avoid integer overflow in constants
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven

References:
- [PATCH] spi: sh-msiof: avoid integer overflow in constants
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH] spi: sh-msiof: avoid integer overflow in constants
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: [PATCH] spi: sh-msiof: avoid integer overflow in constants
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH] spi: sh-msiof: avoid integer overflow in constants
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven