> What about unifying the individual SIFCTR_?FWM_[0-9]* definitions > into SIFCTR_xFWM_[0-9]* instead, and using the bitfield helpers in its > sole user? But they don't match, so we can't unify them? #define SIFCTR_TFWM_1 (7UL << 29) /* Transfer Request when 1 empty stage */ vs #define SIFCTR_RFWM_1 (0 << 13) /* Transfer Request when 1 valid stages */ Also, the steps don't match (1, 4, 8, 12..) vs (1, 4, 8, 16...).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
