Re: AW: [PATCH 1/4] spi: Add parameter for clock to rx delay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:46:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> So, to me sounds like device tree source issue. I.e. you need to provide
> different DT(b)s depending on the platform (and how it should be).
> The cleanest solution (as I see not the first time people I trying quirks like
> this to be part of the subsystems / drivers) is to make DT core (OF) to have
> conditionals or boot-time modifications allowed.

> This, what you are doing, does not scale and smells like an ugly hack.

No, this seems like an entirely reasonable thing to have - it's just a
property of the device, we don't need to add a DT property for it, and
the maximum speed that the device can run at is going to vary depending
on the ability of the controller to control the sampling point.

As people have been saying there's a particularly clear case for this
with SPI flash which is probed at runtime and is readily substituted at
the hardware level.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux