Hi,
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 07:55:23AM +0200, Stefan Moring wrote:
> Op vr 15 sep 2023 om 00:47 schreef Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 02:54:06PM +0200, Stefan Moring wrote:
> > > IMX51 supports 4096 bit burst lengths. Using the spi transfer length
> > > instead of bits_per_word increases performance significantly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Moring <stefan.moring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> >
> > I have an i.MX6ULL system with "inanbo,t28cp45tn89-v17" panel, which
> > breaks due to this change. Reverting this patch results in working
> > panel. Note, that the panel driver [0] does 'spi->bits_per_word = 9;'.
> >
> > [0] drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7789v.c
>
> Would changing line 665 to ctrl |= (spi_imx->count * spi_imx->bits_per_word
> - 1) fix the issue?
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int mx51_ecspi_prepare_transfer(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
if (spi_imx->count >= 512)
ctrl |= 0xFFF << MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_BL_OFFSET;
else
- ctrl |= (spi_imx->count*8 - 1)
+ ctrl |= (spi_imx->count*spi_imx->bits_per_word - 1)
<< MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_BL_OFFSET;
}
on top of 6.6-rc1 fixes the problem. Will you send a proper patch with
Reported-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 15a6af94a277 ("spi: Increase imx51 ecspi burst length based on transfer length")
or should I do it?
Greetings,
-- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
