Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: bus: add device tree bindings for RIFSC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: bus: add device tree bindings for RIFSC
- From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2023 13:39:32 -0600
- Cc: hugues.fruchet@xxxxxxxxxxx, vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lee@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, arnd@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jic23@xxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, olivier.moysan@xxxxxxxxxxx, fabrice.gasnier@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx, alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx, conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Oleksii_Moisieiev@xxxxxxxx, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20230705172759.1610753-3-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>
- References: <20230705172759.1610753-1-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com> <20230705172759.1610753-3-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>
On Wed, 05 Jul 2023 19:27:51 +0200, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
> Document RIFSC (RIF security controller). RIFSC is a firewall controller
> composed of different kinds of hardware resources.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/bus/st,stm32-rifsc.yaml | 101 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/st,stm32-rifsc.yaml
>
My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
yamllint warnings/errors:
dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/st,stm32-rifsc.yaml: title: 'STM32 Resource isolation framework security controller bindings' should not be valid under {'pattern': '([Bb]inding| [Ss]chema)'}
hint: Everything is a binding/schema, no need to say it. Describe what hardware the binding is for.
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230705172759.1610753-3-gatien.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx
The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
should be noted in *this* patch.
If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:
pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux ARM (vger)]
[Linux ARM MSM]
[Linux Omap]
[Linux Arm]
[Linux Tegra]
[Fedora ARM]
[Linux for Samsung SOC]
[eCos]
[Linux Fastboot]
[Gcc Help]
[Git]
[DCCP]
[IETF Announce]
[Security]
[Linux MIPS]
[Yosemite Campsites]
|