Re: [IGNORE][PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: Document common device controller bindings
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [IGNORE][PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: Document common device controller bindings
- From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2023 13:39:32 -0600
- Cc: linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lee@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx, robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@xxxxxxxx>, arnd@xxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fabrice.gasnier@xxxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, hugues.fruchet@xxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Oleksii_Moisieiev@xxxxxxxx, andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, olivier.moysan@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jic23@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx, vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx, arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20230705172759.1610753-2-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>
- References: <20230705172759.1610753-1-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com> <20230705172759.1610753-2-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>
On Wed, 05 Jul 2023 19:27:50 +0200, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
> From: Oleksii Moisieiev <Oleksii_Moisieiev@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Introducing of the common device controller bindings for the controller
> provider and consumer devices. Those bindings are intended to allow
> divided system on chip into muliple domains, that can be used to
> configure hardware permissions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Depends-on: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c869d2751125181a55bc8a88c96e3a892b42f37a.1668070216.git.oleksii_moisieiev@xxxxxxxx/
>
> .../feature-domain-controller.yaml | 84 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/feature-controllers/feature-domain-controller.yaml
>
My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
yamllint warnings/errors:
dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/feature-controllers/feature-domain-controller.yaml: title: 'Generic Domain Controller bindings' should not be valid under {'pattern': '([Bb]inding| [Ss]chema)'}
hint: Everything is a binding/schema, no need to say it. Describe what hardware the binding is for.
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230705172759.1610753-2-gatien.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx
The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
should be noted in *this* patch.
If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:
pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux ARM (vger)]
[Linux ARM MSM]
[Linux Omap]
[Linux Arm]
[Linux Tegra]
[Fedora ARM]
[Linux for Samsung SOC]
[eCos]
[Linux Fastboot]
[Gcc Help]
[Git]
[DCCP]
[IETF Announce]
[Security]
[Linux MIPS]
[Yosemite Campsites]
|