RE: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling

[Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 8:41 PM
> To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>; Mark Brown
> <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>; jsnitsel@xxxxxxxxxx;
> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; peterhuewe@xxxxxx; jgg@xxxxxxxx;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx>; Laxman Dewangan
> <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: 24 April 2023 21:02
> > To: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krishna Yarlagadda
> > <kyarlagadda@xxxxxxxxxx>; jsnitsel@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > peterhuewe@xxxxxx; jgg@xxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > integrity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jonathan Hunter
> > <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sowjanya Komatineni
> > <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx>; Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:18:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:46:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >
> > > > Would it make sense for you to pick up patch 2/3 as well? As far as I
> > > > can tell there's a build dependency on patch 1/3 because of the newly
> > > > added SPI_TPM_HW_FLOW symbol.
> > >
> > > I'll include it in my pull request for spi this time round so it should
> > > end up in -rc1, my thinking was that I was happy with the SPI bits and
> > > if it was in -rc1 then the TPM bits could be handled without cross tree
> > > issues when the review was sorted (which it is now but wasn't at the
> > > time).  If the SPI side doesn't make -rc1 for some reason I can pick up
> > > the TPM bit as well, and/or do a signed tag.
> >
> > Sounds good.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thierry
> 
> Mark,
> Now that SPI changes are in, can we pull this TPM change for rc2.
> Will this be picked into SPI or TPM list?
Jarkko, Mark,
Can we pick this change in TPM list since SPI header changes are in.

Regards
KY
> Thanks,
> KY