On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:18:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:46:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > Would it make sense for you to pick up patch 2/3 as well? As far as I > > can tell there's a build dependency on patch 1/3 because of the newly > > added SPI_TPM_HW_FLOW symbol. > > I'll include it in my pull request for spi this time round so it should > end up in -rc1, my thinking was that I was happy with the SPI bits and > if it was in -rc1 then the TPM bits could be handled without cross tree > issues when the review was sorted (which it is now but wasn't at the > time). If the SPI side doesn't make -rc1 for some reason I can pick up > the TPM bit as well, and/or do a signed tag. Sounds good. Thanks, Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
