On 3/28/23 07:15, Yang Li wrote: > According to commit 890cc39a8799 ("drivers: provide > devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()"), convert > platform_get_resource(), devm_ioremap_resource() to a single > call to devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(), as this is exactly > what this function does. > > Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c > index 5dd3d1901412..8e6e3876aa9a 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c > @@ -440,8 +440,7 @@ static int xilinx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > xspi->bitbang.txrx_bufs = xilinx_spi_txrx_bufs; > init_completion(&xspi->done); > > - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > - xspi->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); > + xspi->regs = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, &res); > if (IS_ERR(xspi->regs)) > return PTR_ERR(xspi->regs); > So we keep the local var res just to print its value? Wouldn't have been better to have something like: diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c index 1411548f4255..693be1eacaca 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c @@ -391,7 +391,6 @@ static int xilinx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct xilinx_spi *xspi; struct xspi_platform_data *pdata; - struct resource *res; int ret, num_cs = 0, bits_per_word; struct spi_master *master; bool force_irq = false; @@ -440,8 +439,7 @@ static int xilinx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) xspi->bitbang.txrx_bufs = xilinx_spi_txrx_bufs; init_completion(&xspi->done); - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); - xspi->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + xspi->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); if (IS_ERR(xspi->regs)) return PTR_ERR(xspi->regs); @@ -493,7 +491,7 @@ static int xilinx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return ret; } - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "at %pR, irq=%d\n", res, xspi->irq); + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "irq=%d\n", xspi->irq); if (pdata) { for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_devices; i++) --- I would get rid of printing xspi->irq too, as I don't see any benefit in printing it, but that would be for another patch, as it is a different logical change.