On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:36 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 3:33 AM Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > When loading a DT overlay that creates a device, the device is not > > instantiated, unless the DT overlay is unloaded and reloaded again. > > > > Saravana explains: > > Basically for all overlays (I hope the function is only used for > > overlays) we assume all nodes are NOT devices until they actually > > get added as a device. Don't review the code, it's not meant to be :) > > > > Based on a hacky patch by Saravana Kannan, which covered only platform > > and spi devices. > > > > Fixes: 4a032827daa89350 ("of: property: Simplify of_link_to_phandle()") > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAGETcx_+rhHvaC_HJXGrr5_WAd2+k5f=rWYnkCZ6z5bGX-wj4w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Marked RFC as Saravana said this is an ugly hack. > > Still, this is a regression in v6.3-rc1 that should be fixed. > > Thanks for making sure this isn't forgotten. > > I thought about this a bit more and I've decided what I gave earlier > isn't really too much of a hack. The other option is to handle the > clearing of the flag at the driver core level, but we incur these > additional instructions for all devices instead of just the overlay > case. But the benefit is that if more busses add overlay support in > the future, they won't need to remember to clear the flag in those > instances too. But they'll probably start off by looking at the > existing platform bus case, so they'll get it right. > > I'll continue the pondering next week and maybe test it on my device > to make sure it's not doing anything weird for non-overlay cases. > Geert, I think we should stick with the original style of fix I suggested. So, basically your patch set. Are you planning on sending a non-RFC or do you want me to do it? -Saravana > --- a/drivers/base/core.c > +++ b/drivers/base/core.c > @@ -3611,6 +3611,15 @@ int device_add(struct device *dev) > */ > if (dev->fwnode && !dev->fwnode->dev) { > dev->fwnode->dev = dev; > + /* > + * If a fwnode was initially marked as not a device, but we > + * clearly have a device added for it that can probe, then clear > + * the flag so fw_devlink will continue linking consumers to > + * this device. This code path is really expected to run only > + * for DT overlays. > + */ > + if (dev->bus) > + dev->fwnode.flags &= ~FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE > fw_devlink_link_device(dev); > } > > diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c > index 07d93753b12f..f715b59d9bf3 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c > +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c > @@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ static void __of_attach_node(struct device_node *np) > np->sibling = np->parent->child; > np->parent->child = np; > of_node_clear_flag(np, OF_DETACHED); > + /* > + * Ask fw_devlink to assume any new node is not a device. Driver core > + * will clear this flag if the assumption turns out to be wrong. > + */ > + np->fwnode.flags |= FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE; > } > > > > > > --- > > drivers/bus/imx-weim.c | 1 + > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c | 1 + > > drivers/of/dynamic.c | 1 + > > drivers/of/platform.c | 1 + > > drivers/spi/spi.c | 1 + > > 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c b/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c > > index 2a6b4f676458612e..71d8807170fa9f29 100644 > > --- a/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c > > +++ b/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c > > @@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ static int of_weim_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, > > "Failed to setup timing for '%pOF'\n", rd->dn); > > > > if (!of_node_check_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED)) { > > + rd->dn->fwnode.flags &= ~FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE; > > if (!of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL, &pdev->dev)) { > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, > > "Failed to create child device '%pOF'\n", > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c > > index bce6b796e04c2ca0..79a0d47010ba0b20 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c > > @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static int of_i2c_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, > > return NOTIFY_OK; > > } > > > > + rd->dn->fwnode.flags &= ~FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE; > > client = of_i2c_register_device(adap, rd->dn); > > if (IS_ERR(client)) { > > dev_err(&adap->dev, "failed to create client for '%pOF'\n", > > diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c > > index 07d93753b12f5f4d..e311d406b1705306 100644 > > --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c > > +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c > > @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static void __of_attach_node(struct device_node *np) > > np->sibling = np->parent->child; > > np->parent->child = np; > > of_node_clear_flag(np, OF_DETACHED); > > + np->fwnode.flags |= FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE; > > } > > > > /** > > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c > > index b2bd2e783445dd78..17c92cbfb62ee3ef 100644 > > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c > > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c > > @@ -737,6 +737,7 @@ static int of_platform_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, > > if (of_node_check_flag(rd->dn, OF_POPULATED)) > > return NOTIFY_OK; > > > > + rd->dn->fwnode.flags &= ~FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE; > > /* pdev_parent may be NULL when no bus platform device */ > > pdev_parent = of_find_device_by_node(rd->dn->parent); > > pdev = of_platform_device_create(rd->dn, NULL, > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c > > index 1a65f96fe2aff591..7bd053a32fad1a3c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c > > @@ -4480,6 +4480,7 @@ static int of_spi_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, > > return NOTIFY_OK; > > } > > > > + rd->dn->fwnode.flags &= ~FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE; > > spi = of_register_spi_device(ctlr, rd->dn); > > put_device(&ctlr->dev); > > > > -- > > 2.34.1 > >