On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 05:58:39PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 07:42:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 05:25:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > That's true currently since you're matching based on ACPI ID and then > > > have the lookup done with the ID information in the acpi_device_id table > > > but IIRC the patch was replacing that with some device property stuff. > > > But that one also based on the IDs, it's not assigned without real IDs of > > the devices on the certain platforms. I don't see how it's different in > > this sense. > > The driver won't even match and therefore load if it doesn't have a > lookup for the device with the current code, the type code comes from > the match. If it has to go querying a device property then the driver > can load but end up with a device property it hasn't ever heard of and > end up misbehaving as a result. That's how all MFD devices work nowadays, right? What's so special about this driver? It's being used as a child by MFD. If what you are telling is a real concern, we have to have a way to assure that all drivers that are children of the MFDs should provide a match. IIRC there is no such mechanism exists in the kernel these days. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko