On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 03:54:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The commit 5e0531f6b90a ("spi: Add capability to perform some transfer
> with chipselect off") added a new flag but squezed it into a wrong
> group of struct spi_transfer members (note that SPI_NBITS_* are macros
> for easier interpretation of the tx_nbits and rx_nbits bitfields.
Besides some small issues with the grammar above, I would like also to
reshuffle the documentation part. Hence, please wait for v2 of this.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Group cs_change and cs_off flags together in struct spi_transfer
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Group cs_change and cs_off flags together in struct spi_transfer
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 16:02:48 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20220908125444.30727-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20220908125444.30727-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Group cs_change and cs_off flags together in struct spi_transfer
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Group cs_change and cs_off flags together in struct spi_transfer
- Prev by Date: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Group cs_change and cs_off flags together in struct spi_transfer
- Next by Date: [PATCH v2 1/1] spi: Group cs_change and cs_off flags together in struct spi_transfer
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 1/1] spi: Group cs_change and cs_off flags together in struct spi_transfer
- Next by thread: [PATCH v2 1/1] spi: Group cs_change and cs_off flags together in struct spi_transfer
- Index(es):
 |