Re: [PATCH] spi: SPI_MICROCHIP_CORE should depend on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/07/2022 11:33, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On 11/07/2022 09:45, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> The Microchip "hard" FPGA SPI controller is only present on Microchip
>> PolarFire SoCs.  Hence add a dependency on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE, to
>> prevent asking the user about this driver when configuring a kernel
>> without Microchip PolarFire SoC support.
>>
>> Fixes: 9ac8d17694b66d54 ("spi: add support for microchip fpga spi controllers")
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Until I get the "soft" version sorted, makes sense to me.
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Actually, I was thinking about why the "soft" version would change
anything and I realised that this is not correct.

I rescind my R-b.

You can also use this on the HiFive Unleashed Expansion board via
chiplink:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/polarfire-soc/polarfire-soc-documentation/master/boards/lc-mpfs-dev-kit/images/updated-lc-libero-design.png

I have never tried this so I forgot about it, but just as the PCI
root port is accessible, so is the SPI.

Sorry!






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux