Re: [RFC] [PATCH v2 00/11] Optimize spi_sync path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 19:15:13 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 04:13:56PM +0200, David Jander wrote:
> > Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> 
> > > Which git branch to use as the base?  
> 
> > Sorry, forgot to mention: spi for-next:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git  
> 
> > This is because it relies on previous patches that have been applied there.  
> 
> It looks like something changed underneath the series unfortunately -
> I'm getting failures applying even the first patch.  Can you rebase
> please?  It looks good to start trying to throw at CI, ideally we'd get
> more on list review but most of the active work recently has been around
> the MTD stuff which is all about trying to use hardware offload for
> flash operations and therefore should be minimally affected by the
> actual SPI data path.

I just rebased v3 onto current spi-next branch. No other changes.

Best regards,

-- 
David Jander




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux