Re: [RFC] [PATCH v2 00/11] Optimize spi_sync path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 04:13:56PM +0200, David Jander wrote:
> Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Which git branch to use as the base?

> Sorry, forgot to mention: spi for-next:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git

> This is because it relies on previous patches that have been applied there.

It looks like something changed underneath the series unfortunately -
I'm getting failures applying even the first patch.  Can you rebase
please?  It looks good to start trying to throw at CI, ideally we'd get
more on list review but most of the active work recently has been around
the MTD stuff which is all about trying to use hardware offload for
flash operations and therefore should be minimally affected by the
actual SPI data path.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux