On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 08:10:13PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 15. Juni 2022 11:49:22 OEZ schrieb Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >Hi, > > > >On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 05:56:54PM +0000, Oleksandr Ocheretnyi -X (oocheret - GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco) wrote: > >> Hello Mika, > >> > >> in my case (I work with memory chip n25q128a13 for recent kernels) I'm > >> getting return value -ENOTSUPP from spi_mem_exec_op() call in the > >> micron_st_nor_read_fsr() method > >> [[1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc2/source/drivers/spi/spi-m > >> em.c#L326]. So I decided to provide the same errorcode to > >> intel_spi_hw_cycle() method because older kernel versions throw the > >> error there. It is fine to use -EOPNOTSUPP return value instead. > >> > >> I suspect we need to cover both cases to check -ENOTSUPP as well as > >> -EOPNOTSUPP to let the driver work properly. > >> > >> if (ret == -ENOTSUPP || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) > > > >I think we should follow the same in the Intel driver and return > >-ENOTSUPP too. > > AFAIK ENOTSUPP is for nfs and shouldn't be used. Yes, but that's what the SPI-NOR core is using so I think we want to be consistent with it.