Hey, p.yadav@xxxxxx wrote on Thu, 21 Apr 2022 12:40:56 +0530: > On 20/04/22 02:04PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:50:22PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > > > The buffers passed in the data phase must be DMA-able. Programmers often > > > don't realise this requirement and pass in buffers that reside on the > > > stack. This can be hard to spot when reviewing code. Reject ops if their > > > data buffer is on the stack to avoid this. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@xxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > Changes in v2: > > > - Include task_stack.h. It might not get included indirectly on some > > > platforms and can cause build failures. > > > - Add a WARN_ON_ONCE() for debuggability. > > > - Add Mark's Ack. > > > > Since this is now an isolated patch does that mean whatever meant that I > > acked rather than applying this patch has gone in and I can now apply it > > directly? > > Yes, you should be able to apply it directly. Miquel's spi-mem-ecc > branch is now in 5.18-rc1 and later. Though this patch never conflicted > with that branch to begin with. The spi-mem-ecc branch does not touch > spi_mem_check_op() as far as I can see. It did during a few version AFAIR, but not the final ones anymore. But it's upstream now, so please feel free to apply. Thanks, Miquèl