Re: [PATCH] spi: remove spin_lock_irq in the irq procress

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/14/22 6:16 AM, 郭力豪 wrote:
Hi Tom :

     This SPI driver only handles one transfer at a time.
That's why locks are not needed.

Please add this statement to the commit log.

In a commit log, not only do I look for what was changed but also why the change was made.

Tom



Li-hao Kuo

Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年4月13日 週三 下午7:45寫道:

On 4/12/22 6:38 PM, Li-hao Kuo wrote:
- remove spin_lock_irq and spin_unlock_irq in the irq funciton
function

I was expecting a statement on why is the lock is not needed.

Could you add one ?

Tom

Signed-off-by: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c | 4 +---
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
index f989f7b..120623c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
@@ -199,8 +199,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sp7021_spi_master_irq(int irq, void *dev)
       if (tx_len == 0 && total_len == 0)
               return IRQ_NONE;

-     spin_lock_irq(&pspim->lock);
-
       rx_cnt = FIELD_GET(SP7021_RX_CNT_MASK, fd_status);
       if (fd_status & SP7021_RX_FULL_FLAG)
               rx_cnt = pspim->data_unit;
@@ -239,7 +237,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sp7021_spi_master_irq(int irq, void *dev)

       if (isrdone)
               complete(&pspim->isr_done);
-     spin_unlock_irq(&pspim->lock);
+
       return IRQ_HANDLED;
   }





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux