Re: [PATCH] spi: remove spin_lock_irq in the irq procress

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/12/22 6:38 PM, Li-hao Kuo wrote:
- remove spin_lock_irq and spin_unlock_irq in the irq funciton

function

I was expecting a statement on why is the lock is not needed.

Could you add one ?

Tom


Signed-off-by: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c | 4 +---
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
index f989f7b..120623c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
@@ -199,8 +199,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sp7021_spi_master_irq(int irq, void *dev)
  	if (tx_len == 0 && total_len == 0)
  		return IRQ_NONE;
- spin_lock_irq(&pspim->lock);
-
  	rx_cnt = FIELD_GET(SP7021_RX_CNT_MASK, fd_status);
  	if (fd_status & SP7021_RX_FULL_FLAG)
  		rx_cnt = pspim->data_unit;
@@ -239,7 +237,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sp7021_spi_master_irq(int irq, void *dev)
if (isrdone)
  		complete(&pspim->isr_done);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&pspim->lock);
+
  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
  }




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux