On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:41:39 +0100 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This driver can be simplified a little bit by using > spi_mem_generic_supports_op() instead of the > spi_mem_default/dtr_supports_op() couple. The all_false boolean is > inverted to become a dtr boolean, which checks if at least one of the > operation member uses dtr mode. The idea behind this change is to > simplify the introduction of the pipelined ECC engine. > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c | 10 +++------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c > index 485a7f2afb44..5e71aa630504 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mxic.c > @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static ssize_t mxic_spi_mem_dirmap_write(struct spi_mem_dirmap_desc *desc, > static bool mxic_spi_mem_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem, > const struct spi_mem_op *op) > { > - bool all_false; > + struct spi_mem_controller_caps caps = {}; > > if (op->data.buswidth > 8 || op->addr.buswidth > 8 || > op->dummy.buswidth > 8 || op->cmd.buswidth > 8) > @@ -465,13 +465,9 @@ static bool mxic_spi_mem_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem, > if (op->addr.nbytes > 7) > return false; > > - all_false = !op->cmd.dtr && !op->addr.dtr && !op->dummy.dtr && > - !op->data.dtr; > + caps.dtr = op->cmd.dtr || op->addr.dtr || op->dummy.dtr || op->data.dtr; Are you sure that's what you want to do? spi_mem_controller_caps is supposed to encode the controller capabilities, not whether the operation contains a DTR cycle or not. I'd expect this caps object to be statically defined, with possibly one instance per-compat if the caps depend on the HW revision. > > - if (all_false) > - return spi_mem_default_supports_op(mem, op); > - else > - return spi_mem_dtr_supports_op(mem, op); > + return spi_mem_generic_supports_op(mem, op, &caps); > } > > static int mxic_spi_mem_dirmap_create(struct spi_mem_dirmap_desc *desc)