Hi Dave, On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 3:58 PM Dave Bender <codehero@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:50 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Does it work if you change GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW to GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH? > > There is a pullup resistor on that CS line, so that GPIO must be active low. I do believe you. But there's been some issues with inverted CS gpio behavior when switching from board files to DT, so I thought I'd better ask to try... > Digging deeper into the code, it looks like David Bauer made some > changes that limit the spi driver's CS usage to only the CS0, CS1, CS2 > pins. > There is also no bounds checking on the CS value. > I don't understand how this driver can even use generic GPIO if it > forces use of the CS bits on the SPI_IOC register. OK, that sounds like a reasonable culprit... > > static int ar934x_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *master, > struct spi_message *m) > { > .... > .... > for (trx_done = 0; trx_done < t->len; trx_done += 4) { > > ..... > reg = AR934X_SPI_SHIFT_VAL(spi->chip_select, term, > trx_cur * 8); > iowrite32(reg, sp->base + AR934X_SPI_REG_SHIFT_CTRL); Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds