On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 03:04:27PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > Is that correct? Some time ago you've already applied that to your spi tree: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/160132174502.55568.11234605078950751454.b4-ty@xxxxxxxxxx/ No, it's a bug in b4.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature