Re: [PATCH] serial: max310x: rework RX interrupt handling

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 05:54:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 5:50 PM Thomas Petazzoni
> <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:24:48 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > > On a Microchip SAMA5D3 platform that is receiving 20 bytes every 16ms
> > > > over one MAX310X UART, this patch has allowed to reduce the CPU
> > > > consumption of the interrupt handler thread from ~25% to 6-7%.
> > >
> > > Was it always like this?
> >
> > As far as I can see, yes. I guess you were thinking about a Fixes: tag
> > perhaps? I don't think a Fixes: tag really applies here, as we're not
> > fixing a performance regression.
> 
> Thanks for elaboration.
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > +       /* Reset FIFOs*/
> > >
> > > Add a space before the asterisk.
> >
> > Indeed. Let me know if a v2 is needed, or if this small typo can be
> > fixed when applying.
> 
> Greg usually doesn't touch commits, so v2 would be better.

Agreed, I don't like to edit things :)