Re: [PATCH 02/11] spi: sprd: Simplify with dev_err_probe()

[Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 23:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Common pattern of handling deferred probe can be simplified with
> dev_err_probe().  Less code and the error value gets printed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Chunyan

> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c |  5 +----
>  drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c     | 17 +++++------------
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c
> index 127b8bd25831..392ec5cfa3d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c
> @@ -504,10 +504,7 @@ static int sprd_adi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                         dev_info(&pdev->dev, "no hardware spinlock supplied\n");
>                         break;
>                 default:
> -                       dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> -                               "failed to find hwlock id, %d\n", ret);
> -                       fallthrough;
> -               case -EPROBE_DEFER:
> +                       dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to find hwlock id\n");
>                         goto put_ctlr;
>                 }
>         }
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c
> index 0443fec3a6ab..635738f54c73 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c
> @@ -553,22 +553,15 @@ static int sprd_spi_dma_tx_config(struct sprd_spi *ss, struct spi_transfer *t)
>  static int sprd_spi_dma_request(struct sprd_spi *ss)
>  {
>         ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_RX] = dma_request_chan(ss->dev, "rx_chn");
> -       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_RX])) {
> -               if (PTR_ERR(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_RX]) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> -                       return PTR_ERR(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_RX]);
> -
> -               dev_err(ss->dev, "request RX DMA channel failed!\n");
> -               return PTR_ERR(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_RX]);
> -       }
> +       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_RX]))
> +               return dev_err_probe(ss->dev, PTR_ERR(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_RX]),
> +                                    "request RX DMA channel failed!\n");
>
>         ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_TX]  = dma_request_chan(ss->dev, "tx_chn");
>         if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_TX])) {
>                 dma_release_channel(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_RX]);
> -               if (PTR_ERR(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_TX]) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> -                       return PTR_ERR(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_TX]);
> -
> -               dev_err(ss->dev, "request TX DMA channel failed!\n");
> -               return PTR_ERR(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_TX]);
> +               return dev_err_probe(ss->dev, PTR_ERR(ss->dma.dma_chan[SPRD_SPI_TX]),
> +                                    "request TX DMA channel failed!\n");
>         }
>
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.17.1
>