On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 09:02:07AM +0200, Alain Volmat wrote: > From: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@xxxxxx> > > The spi disable could potentially require some time to finish. > It has to be executed at the end of a transfer, but there is > no reason to call it in the irq handler. > > Simplify the irq handler by moving out the spi disable. The > synchronization through xfer_completion is used to defer the > execution of spi disable. Should this be an unprepare_transfer_hardware() operation? That would allow the framework to take care of scheduling this in an appropriate context with the added advantage of not needing to do it when there's another message scheduled immediately.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
