On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On 15/07/2020 16:06:30+0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > It's there so why not use it. > > > > Is that the correct resolution? Isn't the proper thing to do simply > removing at91_usart_spi_dt_ids as the only way it will ever be probed is > through drivers/mfd/at91-usart.c and I would think matching the driver > name is enough. I'm 50/50 on this. Happy with whatever the authors/maintainers decide most appropriate. > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): > > > > drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c:684:34: warning: ‘at91_usart_spi_dt_ids’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] > > 684 | static const struct of_device_id at91_usart_spi_dt_ids[] = { > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Cc: Radu Pirea <radu_nicolae.pirea@xxxxxx> > > Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c b/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c > > index 88033422a42ae..d47a20be43ccd 100644 > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c > > @@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ static struct platform_driver at91_usart_spi_driver = { > > .driver = { > > .name = "at91_usart_spi", > > .pm = &at91_usart_spi_pm_ops, > > + .of_match_table = at91_usart_spi_dt_ids, > > }, > > .probe = at91_usart_spi_probe, > > .remove = at91_usart_spi_remove, > -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog