Re: [PATCH V2 2/8] soc: qcom: geni: Support for ICC voting

[Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Akash,

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 06:42:08PM +0530, Akash Asthana wrote:
> Add necessary macros and structure variables to support ICC BW
> voting from individual SE drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akash Asthana <akashast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
>  - As per Bjorn's comment dropped enums for ICC paths, given the three
>    paths individual members
> 
>  include/linux/qcom-geni-se.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/qcom-geni-se.h b/include/linux/qcom-geni-se.h
> index dd46494..eaae16e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/qcom-geni-se.h
> +++ b/include/linux/qcom-geni-se.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
>  #ifndef _LINUX_QCOM_GENI_SE
>  #define _LINUX_QCOM_GENI_SE
>  
> +#include <linux/interconnect.h>
> +
>  /* Transfer mode supported by GENI Serial Engines */
>  enum geni_se_xfer_mode {
>  	GENI_SE_INVALID,
> @@ -33,6 +35,15 @@ struct clk;
>   * @clk:		Handle to the core serial engine clock
>   * @num_clk_levels:	Number of valid clock levels in clk_perf_tbl
>   * @clk_perf_tbl:	Table of clock frequency input to serial engine clock
> + * @icc_path_geni_to_core:	ICC path handle for geni to core
> + * @icc_path_cpu_to_geni:	ICC path handle for cpu to geni
> + * @icc_path_geni_to_ddr:	ICC path handle for geni to ddr
> + * @avg_bw_core:	Average bus bandwidth value for QUP core 2x clock
> + * @peak_bw_core:	Peak bus bandwidth value for QUP core 2x clock
> + * @avg_bw_cpu:		Average bus bandwidth value for CPU
> + * @peak_bw_cpu:	Peak bus bandwidth value for CPU
> + * @avg_bw_ddr:		Average bus bandwidth value for DDR
> + * @peak_bw_ddr:	Peak bus bandwidth value for DDR
>   */
>  struct geni_se {
>  	void __iomem *base;
> @@ -41,6 +52,15 @@ struct geni_se {
>  	struct clk *clk;
>  	unsigned int num_clk_levels;
>  	unsigned long *clk_perf_tbl;
> +	struct icc_path *icc_path_geni_to_core;
> +	struct icc_path *icc_path_cpu_to_geni;
> +	struct icc_path *icc_path_geni_to_ddr;
> +	unsigned int avg_bw_core;
> +	unsigned int peak_bw_core;
> +	unsigned int avg_bw_cpu;
> +	unsigned int peak_bw_cpu;
> +	unsigned int avg_bw_ddr;
> +	unsigned int peak_bw_ddr;

Those are a lot of new individual struct members. How about clustering
them, e.g.:

struct geni_icc_path {
	struct icc_path *path;
	unsigned int avg_bw;
	unsigned int peak_bw;
};

struct geni_iccs_paths {
	struct geni_icc_path to_core;
	struct geni_icc_path from_cpu;
	struct geni_icc_path to_ddr;
};

And 'struct geni_se' just gets this entry:

	struct geni_icc_paths icc;

or alternatively three 'struct geni_icc_path' entries.