Am 2020-03-09 20:59, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 21:06, Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 2020-03-09 15:56, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx>
>
> LS1028A has a functional connection to the eDMA module. Even if the
> spi-fsl-dspi.c driver is not using DMA for LS1028A now, define the
> slots
> in the DMAMUX for connecting the eDMA channels to the 3 DSPI
> controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> index 515e0a1b934f..18155273a46e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> @@ -298,6 +298,8 @@
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> clock-names = "dspi";
> clocks = <&clockgen 4 1>;
> + dmas = <&edma0 0 62>, <&edma0 0 60>;
> + dma-names = "tx", "rx";
minor nit. Other nodes specified the dma channels as
dma-names = "tx", "rx";
dmas = <&edma0 0 62>,
<&edma0 0 60>;
-michael
Does it matter?
No, therefore "minor nit". Its just formatted other then everything else
in the file.
-michael