Re: [RFC PATCH 03/15] spi: make `cs_change_delay` the first user of the `spi_delay` logic

["Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 14:43 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> [External]
> 
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 01:04:42PM +0000, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 13:47 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > That v3 seems to be a small subset of this series?
> > Ack.
> > V3 is the first 4 patches from this series.
> > Well, patches 3 & 4 are squashed.
> > I am 100% convinced that the entire series is a good idea.

Something happened here to the "not" word.
Probably got lost in an alternate dimension  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ .

Was supposed to be:
"I am not 100% convinced that the entire series is a good idea."


> > In the sense that a `struct spi_delay` may be a good idea, but at the
> > same time, it may be un-needed.
> > All I wanted to do, was to add another delay somewhere, and got lost in
> > the rework of current delays.
> > I thought about proposing just the first 4 patches [on their own], but
> > I thought that showing the current series as-is
> > now, may be a good idea as well [to gather some feedback].
> 
> I think it makes more sense to review as a whole series rather than only
> a part of the conversion, it doesn't really help to only do part of it.
> 
> Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
> substantially less than 80 columns.  Doing this makes your messages much
> easier to read and reply to.

Ack.
Problem is: I have to re-setup my email client every now-n-then since the
work-email server has some issues with Linux email clients.
And I sometimes forget to configure this.
[ Exchange does not always get along well with non-Outlook clients ]