On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 12:26:55PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:13:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > The SPI thingies request FIFO-99 by default, reduce this to FIFO-50. > > I don't have a cover letter or any other context, what's going on here > with dependencies? Patch stands on it own. I just went through the tree looking for FIFO (ab)users.
Re: [PATCH 5/5] spi: Reduce kthread priority
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] spi: Reduce kthread priority
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 14:07:09 +0200
- Cc: mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Benson Leung <bleung@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20190801112655.GA5488@sirena.org.uk>
- References: <20190801111348.530242235@infradead.org> <20190801111541.917256884@infradead.org> <20190801112655.GA5488@sirena.org.uk>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
- References:
- [PATCH 5/5] spi: Reduce kthread priority
- From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] spi: Reduce kthread priority
- From: Mark Brown
- [PATCH 5/5] spi: Reduce kthread priority
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drivers: Introduce device lookup variants by ACPI_COMPANION device
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drivers: Introduce device lookup variants by ACPI_COMPANION device
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/5] spi: Reduce kthread priority
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/5] spi: Reduce kthread priority
- Index(es):
 |