cc'ing Doug as he might be really interested on this patch On 1/8/19 13:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > The SPI thingies request FIFO-99 by default, reduce this to FIFO-50. > You say below that is not a suitable default but there is any other reason? Did you observed problems with this? > FIFO-99 is the very highest priority available to SCHED_FIFO and > it not a suitable default; it would indicate the SPI work is the > most important work on the machine. > > Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_spi.c | 2 +- > drivers/spi/spi.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_spi.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_spi.c > @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static int cros_ec_spi_devm_high_pri_all > struct cros_ec_spi *ec_spi) > { > struct sched_param sched_priority = { > - .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO - 1, > + .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO / 2, > }; > int err; > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c > @@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ static void spi_pump_messages(struct kth > */ > static void spi_set_thread_rt(struct spi_controller *ctlr) > { > - struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO - 1 }; > + struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO / 2 }; > > dev_info(&ctlr->dev, > "will run message pump with realtime priority\n"); > >