On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:10:08AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 08:37:40PM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 10:38 -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Or if there's a good reason to require the explicit bind then we should > > > remove this from here so we're consistent between buses. I guess send > > > patches to the other buses and see what happens? > > > Having the automatic attach makes it far easier to use with udev. I > > can send a patch for other busses. I hope it doesn't get rejected > > with, "That would have been a good idea, but we can't change it now > > because someone might care about it not attaching." Even though no one > > does. > > Yeah, I agree that it's a good default to have - my only concern here is > that we have a consistent ABI between the different subsystems. BTW it might be useful to split this up for SPI as well so we can merge the feature without the attach and then add it later if we get all the other buses to agree to do it, that way people can get the feature in the next release even if the attach gets bogged down in review. Hopefully not but just in case...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
