Hi Mark, On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:11:27 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:44:31AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > 2/ we create a new header (drivers/spi/internals.h?) for all > > definitions that are meant for internal use (shared between spi.c > > and spi-mem.c) > > > I personally prefer #2 as it provides a better separation between spi > > and spi-mem code. > > --- > > drivers/spi/spi.c | 23 +++++------------------ > > include/linux/spi/spi.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > I prefer that too (if you prefer it you should go with it so it's the > option on the table!). I hesitated for long and went for the solution I didn't like, mainly because everything is already put in a single header file so I thought you would prefer that approach. > I'd go with drivers/spi/internals.h though so > that it's even more obvious if something is being silly trying to use > it when they shouldn't. Okay, I'll move those definitions to drivers/spi/internals.h. Thanks, Boris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html