On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:45 PM, Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 7:05 AM, <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This patch adds documentation for Device-Tree bindings for the >> Socionext Synquacer spi driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-synquacer.txt | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-synquacer.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-synquacer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-synquacer.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..d013cfd >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-synquacer.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ >> +* Socionext Synquacer HS-SPI bindings >> + >> +Required Properties: >> +- compatible: should be "socionext,synquacer-spi" >> +- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped >> + region. >> +- clocks: Must contain an entry for rate source clock(s). >> +- clock-names: Shall be "iHCLK" or "iPCLK". iHCLK is preferred over iPCLK > > Huh? The clock binding should reflect all clocks connected to a block, > not a selection of which one you want to use. > Both the clocks are internal to the block and derived from the same source. Instead of defining a new "use-ipclk" property, the driver uses the clock-names to choose the appropriate divider. I am open to any better option. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html