On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:08:06PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 02:56:00PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > > This is fine for now since all the ACPI devices are dummy ones but as > > soon as someone comes up with an actual ACPI ID for something that > > should be managed via spidev it'll need changing... > Sure. That's why the comment above also mentions SPT000* there. I'm trying to suggest that it'd be nice to write the code to check the IDs and only warns when appropriate. :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
