On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 02:56:00PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:38:03PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > + /* > > + * The ACPI SPT000* devices are only meant for development and > > + * testing. Systems used in production should have a proper ACPI > > + * description of the connected peripheral and they should also use > > + * a proper driver instead of poking directly to the SPI bus. > > + */ > > + if (has_acpi_companion(&spi->dev)) > > + dev_warn(&spi->dev, "do not use this driver in production systems!\n"); > > + > > This is fine for now since all the ACPI devices are dummy ones but as > soon as someone comes up with an actual ACPI ID for something that > should be managed via spidev it'll need changing... Sure. That's why the comment above also mentions SPT000* there. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html