On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:53:31PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 26 June 2016 at 14:45, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No, there's other things like figuring out which controller to bind to > > that need to be taken into consideration. > Why do you care? So long as you name the CS that is available on > connector with the same pinout same on all boards you can target the > slave regardless of the controller it's attached to. That would be a binding for the connector which is the big missing bit here - it's not clear that such a limited connector description would be a good idea.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
