On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 01:35:46PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 26 June 2016 at 13:21, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You can just add the entire slave node in the overlay, it's not clear > > that this buys us anything useful > You have to target the master node and specify the CS in the overlay > if you create the whole node. If you target the slave node you have > the CS specified in the board devicetree and the overlay can apply to > multiple boards without change. No, there's a lot more to having overlays to board-neutral connectors... > > and this needs to be joined up with the work going on to allow > > expansion connector overlays to be loaded in the first place. > The overlays work equally well before and after this patch. I don't > see any problem with them other than part of the infrastructure > missing in mainline kernel. ...you're missing all this stuff here - currently the active work on this is being done by Patelis. It's not at all clear to me that referring to a slave rather than a master would be any easier in a board neutral overlay.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
