RE: [PATCHv3 2/2] bindings: spi: Add clock entries for spi-xilinx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> If they can be separate they should both be modeled in the CCF. There is no
> issue of them coming from the same source.
> Also, the name should map to the name from the spec, as Lars pointed out
> already. You should not invent new names for clocks that are clearly defined
> in the data sheet.

Will fix in the next version

>
>       Sören


This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����)��jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux