Am 01.12.2015 um 20:58 schrieb Mark Brown: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:51:06PM -0000, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> On some SPI controllers it is not feasible to transfer arbitrary amount >> of data at once. >> >> When the limit on transfer size is a few kilobytes at least it makes >> sense to use the SPI hardware rather than reverting to gpio driver. > >> + /* >> + * on some hardware transfer size may be constrained >> + * the limit may depend on device transfer settings >> + */ >> + size_t (*max_transfer_size)(struct spi_device *spi); > > Heiner submitted a *very* similar patch just now with a straight > variable plus accessor instead of a function and using a name with _msg. > I'm ambivalent on the implementation but prefer the naming here since > that's more the limitation we're trying to express I think (some > hardware does have limiations about multple transfers too). Can the two > of you come up with something that works for both of you? > Sure .. Just one inquiry: When you say "the naming here" you refer to Michal's or my version? Actually I like in Michal's hook that it directly takes a struct spi_device. This saves the caller one level of indirection as the caller usually will deal with a spi_device and not a spi_master. If you're fine with Michal's version then this is also fine with me, especially as the functionality is the same. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html