On Tuesday 01 December 2015 22:52:12 Vinod Koul wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:45:34PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > Add support for providing device to filter_fn mapping so client drivers > > can switch to use the dma_request_chan() API. > > Any reason why we dont want to go with DT based only for edma here? I think the OMAP2 based platforms using edma are all DT-only, but mach-davinci would need a lot of work for that. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [RFC v02 04/15] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter mapping to slave devices
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [RFC v02 04/15] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter mapping to slave devices
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 21:20:28 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20151201172212.GC1696@localhost>
- User-agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [RFC v02 00/15] dmaengine: New 'universal' API for requesting channel
- From: Peter Ujfalusi
- [RFC v02 04/15] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter mapping to slave devices
- From: Peter Ujfalusi
- Re: [RFC v02 04/15] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter mapping to slave devices
- From: Vinod Koul
- [RFC v02 00/15] dmaengine: New 'universal' API for requesting channel
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC v02 00/15] dmaengine: New 'universal' API for requesting channel
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: added spi_resource management
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC v02 04/15] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter mapping to slave devices
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC v02 04/15] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter mapping to slave devices
- Index(es):
 |