Hello Mark, On 11/16/2015 02:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:26:49PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> On 11/16/2015 10:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> What I don't really understand here is why we've decided to push all >>> this stuff into the subsystems, it seems like if we're managing to do >>> the matching based on the compatible we really ought to be able to have >>> the core figure out the uevents for us too. I need to go have a look at >>> that... > >> There is already a set of generic OF uevents that are reported by the core >> but IIUC those are not used by udev. Please take a look to of_device_uevent() >> in drivers/of/device.c and dev_uevent() that calls it in drivers/base/core.c. > > I know what the current situation is, my point is that I don't > understand why we would choose to do that ("What I don't really > understand here..."). > Got it, sorry for misunderstanding you. I also don't know the answer FWIW. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html