On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > (Changing subject line, because apparently some people ignore mail if it > doesn't have 'SPI' in the subject line) Well, if you mean me I'm getting CCed on such a large number of large threads about MTD patches that only have relevance to SPI in that they're for a driver that uses SPI that I pretty delete a very large proportion of mail that looks like it's about MTD patch unread I'm afraid. It's almost all completely irrelevant and uninteresting to me. > > Is this [1] getting fixed in SPI any time soon? Looks like there was > > some progress [2], but AFAICT it's not completed. Please include human readable descriptions of things like commits IDs and issues being discussed in e-mail in your mails, this makes them much easier for humans to read especially when they have no internet access. I do frequently catch up on my mail on flights or while otherwise travelling so this is even more pressing for me than just being about making things a bit easier to read. > > I'd just like to know what the way forward here should be for m25p80. > > Really, "jedec,spi-nor" never autoloaded modules very reliably because > > of the SPI core constaints. So I'm not sure I'd consider this a > > regression, and I might be OK waiting around if it'll be fixed in a > > reasonable time frame. Someone will need to tell me what the actual problem is for m25p80 before I can understand what the way forward might be. From a brief scan through of the thread it looks like if Javier's series solves the problem it needs a bit more analysis and/or a clearer presentation and probably a resubmit.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
