On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:47:00AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On 08/21/2015 01:25 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:45:09PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >>> IOW, it's labeled as such mostly for safety, since it has quite a few > >>> distributed dependencies. > > Are there really only 17 drivers that are missing an explict of_table? > > That seems like a low number. > In fact the 17 patches are the combination of the SPI drivers that: > a) Have a .id_table but not a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi,...) > b) Have a .of_match_table but no a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of,...) > c) Don't have a .of_match_table but have a DT binding document > Maybe there are more SPI drivers out there that only have a .id_table > and don't have a .of_match_table nor a DT binding doc. But in that case > there isn't too much I can do since I've no information that these are > drivers are actually used in systems booted with OF. We could at the very least scan through the in tree DTs. There does seem to be a substantial overlap between systems that often don't use modular kernels but could and systems where people are using the I2C and SPI ID mapping shims.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
