On 08/20/2015 11:08 PM, Brian Norris wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:36:34AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:07:31AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>> From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> An SPI driver that supports both OF and legacy platforms, will have >>> both an OF and SPI ID table. This means that when built as a module, >>> the aliases will be filled from both tables, e.g: >> >> This is tagged as something that can't be applied but you've not >> explained why it can't be applied or what comments might be useful :( > As Brian pointed out it was in the cover letter so I thought it would just be duplicated information. But you are right, I should had added a brief note as well just to make the patch self contained. > I believe that's mostly addressed in the cover letter [1]. > > Patch #18 changes the logic of spi_uevent() to report an OF modalias > if the device was registered using OF. But this patch is included in > the series only as an RFC for illustration purposes since changing > that without first applying all the other patches in this series, will > break module autoloading for the drivers of devices registered using > OF but that lacks an of_match_table. I'll repost patch #18 once all > the patches in this series have landed. > > IOW, it's labeled as such mostly for safety, since it has quite a few > distributed dependencies. > That's correct. If is merged before the other patches, module autoloading will break for the drivers that are relying on the current behavior. I just added for illustration purposes to show what was the plan. > Brian > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/20/109 > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html