Re: [PATCH v6] spi: Add SPI driver for Mikrotik RB4xx series boards

[Bert Vermeulen <bert@xxxxxxxx>]

On 04/09/2015 11:50 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:31:12PM +0200, Bert Vermeulen wrote:
>>  The m25p80-compatible boot flash and (some models) MMC use regular SPI,
>>  bitbanged as required by the SoC. However the SPI-connected CPLD has
>>  a "fast write" mode, in which two bits are transferred by SPI clock
>>  cycle. The second bit is transmitted with the SoC's CS2 pin.
> 
>>  Protocol drivers using this fast write facility signal this by setting
>>  the cs_change flag on transfers.
> 
>> The cs_change flag is used here instead of the openwrt version's
>> spi_transfer.fast_write flag. The CPLD driver sets this flag on a
>> per-transfer basis.
> 
> No, this is broken - it's abusing a standard API in a way that's
> completly incompatible with the meaning of that API which is obviously a
> very bad idea, especially since good practice is to offload the
> implementation of that standard API to the core.  It *sounds* like
> you're just trying to implement two wire mode which does have a standard
> API, please use that.

Can you please advise what kind of solution would be acceptable then? I need
to signal from an SPI protocol driver to an SPI master on a per-transfer basis.

Adding a flag to struct spi_transfer for this one driver, as openwrt does,
seems stupid -- I agree. And sure, using spi_transfer.cs_change is a little
dodgy. But I don't see a standard way to do it otherwise, and I don't really
want to keep trying things until you approve of one. So tell me how you
would do it, and I'll implement it that way. I just want to get this code in.

Also, I have no idea what you mean by two-wire mode. This "fast mode" is SPI
+ one extra pin.


-- 
Bert Vermeulen        bert@xxxxxxxx          email/xmpp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html