On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:10:56AM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:28 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > About the API usage, point taken. GPIO requesting part is more important > > > in this case. pinctrl core did not request pins and wrong DT configuration > > > could lead to surprises without any warnings or errors. > > That doesn't answer my concern at all. > I am not sure that I am following you. > I can not use spi_master::cs_gpios, which is populated by > of_spi_register_master(), because spi_register_master() > populate SPI devices and they could issue setup method. I'm sorry but I can't parse the above. What does "they could issue setup method" mean and why is it a problem? > Requesting GPIO's in core framework is also not a easy > option because of arguments here[1]. We should really fix that though.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
